Student autonomy—learners’ capacity to make choices, set goals, and take responsibility for their learning—is a powerful driver of creativity, problem-solving, and lifelong learning. In Bangladesh, widespread gains in enrolment mask persistent challenges of learning poverty, high dropout rates, exam-centric culture, and uneven implementation of competency-based reforms. This article synthesizes national and international evidence, presents a short case vignette of curriculum shifts, and proposes an actionable roadmap to mainstream autonomy across assessment, curriculum, teacher development, and community practice. Policy recommendations are measurable, practical, and tailored to Bangladesh’s institutional context.
Introduction
Education systems worldwide are shifting from rote content delivery to student-centered approaches that emphasize inquiry, project work, choice, reflection, and accountability (Zimmerman, 2002). For Bangladesh, which aspires to transition into a knowledge and skills economy, embedding student autonomy is essential to nurture adaptable graduates capable of meeting digital, ecological, and social challenges. However, the education system remains strongly oriented toward high-stakes examinations and teacher-led pedagogy, making systemic change both urgent and difficult.
Key Facts and the Evidence Base
Enrollment and parity. Bangladesh has achieved high enrolment rates. National education statistics (BANBEIS, 2023) show secondary gross and net enrolment ratios in the 70% range, with near gender parity.
Completion and dropout. UNICEF (2023) reports that only about 64% of children complete secondary schooling, with dropout rates exceeding 30% in some regions (The Daily Star, 2024).
Learning outcomes. The World Bank (2022) highlights that many students fail to reach minimum proficiency levels by the end of primary school, undermining autonomy since basic literacy and numeracy are prerequisites for self-directed learning.
Policy direction. The National Curriculum Framework (NCTB, 2021) formally adopts competency-based approaches that align with student autonomy, but implementation in classrooms remains uneven.
Why Autonomy Matters for Bangladesh
A logic model illustrates the pathway:
Inputs (curriculum flexibility, teacher training, community support) → Processes (student choice, project learning, portfolio assessment) → Immediate outcomes (motivation, engagement) → Medium-term outcomes (retention, transferable skills) → Long-term impacts (innovative workforce, resilient citizens).
Without addressing learning poverty, autonomy initiatives risk benefiting only already advantaged students.
Case Vignette: Competency Ideas in Practice
Between 2021–2024, Bangladesh piloted a competency-based National Curriculum Framework. In select urban schools, teachers facilitated inquiry projects (e.g., community flood-resilience mapping). Students selected questions, gathered data, and presented solutions through portfolios and exhibitions. Reports suggested higher motivation and stronger communication skills. However, scalability was limited by exam pressures, lack of teacher coaching, and resource constraints.
Main Challenges
 |
| Foreshadowing meaning: Students are outgrowing rigid systems; change is inevitable. |
1. Exam-centered assessment (SSC/HSC) drives rote memorization.
2. Limited teacher capacity in facilitating open-ended learning.
3. Resource and equity gaps, especially in rural, disaster-prone, and refugee contexts.
4. Weak foundational literacy and numeracy.
5. Cultural and parental pressure to prioritize marks over skills.
Policy and Practice Roadmap
A. Reorient Assessment
Introduce school-level portfolios and gradually integrate them into public exams.
Indicators: few schools submitting portfolios; student engagement scores.
B. Teacher Professional Development
Nationwide in-service training on facilitation, project learning, and formative assessment.
Indicators: minor percent of teachers trained; classroom observation scores.
C. Protect Foundational Learning
Parallel remedial literacy and numeracy programs targeting low performers.
Indicators: low percentage of attaining minimum proficiency; remedial learning gains.
D. Curriculum and Pedagogy
Introduce “choice windows” in syllabus (20% class time for student-driven inquiry).
Indicators: schools implementing; quality ratings of exemplar projects.
E. Community and Parental Engagement
Parent orientation and student exhibitions to shift perceptions of success.
Indicators: Parent survey shifts; apprenticeship placements.
F. Equity and Resilience
Special pathways for vulnerable learners (e.g., mobile kits in climate-affected zones).
Indicators: Participation and completion rates of targeted groups.
Monitoring and Evaluation
 |
| Foreshadowing meaning: Transformation is coming, but not without struggle. |
|
|
Phase 1 (0–18 months): Pilot 50–200 schools.
Phase 2 (18–48 months): Evaluate learning outcomes, costs, and qualitative classroom change.
Phase 3 (48–84 months): Scale up with portfolio assessments in national exams.
Core metrics: inquiry project completion, engagement index, facilitation scores, proficiency rates, dropout reduction.
Costing and Financing
Funds can be reallocated from exam logistics to teacher training and learning materials. Donors (World Bank, UNICEF) and private CSR can co-finance digital tools. A phased scale-up minimizes upfront cost while generating evidence for long-term investment.
Conclusion
Student autonomy provides Bangladesh a pathway to develop resilient, innovative learners. To succeed, reforms must integrate foundational learning, assessment redesign, teacher development, and community buy-in. The competency-based curriculum signals readiness; the challenge is implementation at scale with equity. Done well, autonomy could become a cornerstone of Bangladesh’s education transformation.
---
References
BANBEIS. (2023). Bangladesh education statistics 2023. Ministry of Education, Government of Bangladesh.
National Curriculum and Textbook Board (NCTB). (2021). National Curriculum Framework. Dhaka: Ministry of Education.
The Daily Star. (2024, March). Secondary dropout challenges persist across regions. Dhaka.
UNICEF. (2023). Education in Bangladesh: Data and analysis. UNICEF Bangladesh.
World Bank. (2022). Learning poverty brief: Bangladesh. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64–70.
Aminul Islam Tuku,
Chief Facilitator, Centre of Excellence
.png)
.png)
.jpeg)
